Return to Sports after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Reality or Utopia? A 48-Month Follow-Up Prospective Study

Abstract

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increased in popularity in the last years, also in younger and more active patients with great expectancies. The purpose of our study was to investigate the change in sports activities before and after medial UKA. We surveyed 53 athletic patients; all underwent cemented medial UKA, to determine not only their subjective and objective evaluation of clinical status with Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) and visual analog score (VAS) score, but also their sporting and recreational activities at a mean follow-up of 48 ± 6 months (range, 18–56 months). At the last follow-up, 48 of 53 patients were engaged in sports and recreational disciplines, resulting in a return to activity rate of 90%. No early failure and no cases of revision were reported. The frequency of activities (sessions per week) and the time session remained constant at the time of survey. The most common activities after surgery were hiking, cycling, and swimming. Several high-impact activities, as well as skiing and football, had a significant decrease in participating patients. There were no gender-, age- and body mass index (BMI)-related differences. UKA can be considered a viable alternative in relatively young patients with high functional requirements and the correct indications, however, warning the patients about the risks of polyethylene wear and early loosening of the prosthetic components as a result of the resumption of sporting activities in high impact.

Level of Evidence Prospective case series, level 4.

Keywords

medial UKA - physical activity - unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - sport

• References

• 1 O'Rourke MR, Gardner JJ, Callaghan JJ. , et al. The John Insall Award: unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum twenty-one-year followup, end-result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 440 (440) 27-37
• 2 rPrice AJ, Waite JC, Svard U. Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (435) 171-180
• 3 Steele RG, Hutabarat S, Evans RL, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH. Survivorship of the St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental knee replacement beyond ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88 (09) 1164-1168
• 4 Kozinn SC, Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71 (01) 145-150
• 5 Deshmukh RV, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for younger patients: an alternative view. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (404) 108-112
• 6 Bert JM. Unicompartmental knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36 (04) 513-522
• 7 Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (273) 151-156
• 8 Callaghan JJ. Unicompartmental knee replacement: introduction: where have we been? Where are we now? Where are we going?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (430) 272-273
• 9 McGrory BJ, Stuart MJ, Sim FH. Participation in sports after hip and knee arthroplasty: review of literature and survey of surgeon preferences. Mayo Clin Proc 1995; 70 (04) 342-348
• 10 Ollivier M, Parratte S, Argenson JN. Results and outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2013; 44 (03) 287-300
• 11 Walton NP, Jahromi I, Lewis PL, Dobson PJ, Angel KR, Campbell DG. Patient-perceived outcomes and return to sport and work: TKA versus mini-incision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2006; 19 (02) 112-116
• 12 Hopper GP, Leach WJ. Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (10) 973-979
• 13 Ho JC, Stitzlein RN, Green CJ, Stoner T, Froimson MI. Return to sports activity following UKA and TKA. J Knee Surg 2016; 29 (03) 254-259
• 14 Healy WL, Iorio R, Lemos MJ. Athletic activity after joint replacement. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (03) 377-388
• 15 Schmalzried TP, Callaghan JJ. Wear in total hip and knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81 (01) 115-136
• 16 Whiteside LA. Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last: three keys to success. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (04) (Suppl. 02) 2-3
• 17 Ranawat CS, Shine JJ. Duo-condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973; (94) 185-195
• 18 Waldstein W, Kolbitsch P, Koller U, Boettner F, Windhager R. Sport and physical activity following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (03) 717-728
• 19 Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80 (05) 862-865
• 20 Yang KY, Wang MC, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Minimally invasive unicondylar versus total condylar knee arthroplasty--early results of a matched-pair comparison. Singapore Med J 2003; 44 (11) 559-562
• 21 Healy WL, Iorio R, Lemos MJ. Athletic activity after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; (380) 65-71
• 22 Pescatello LS, Franklin BA, Fagard R, Farquhar WB, Kelley GA, Ray CA. ; American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and hypertension. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36 (03) 533-553
• 23 Christiansen C. Osteoporosis: diagnosis and management today and tomorrow. Bone 1995; 17 (5, Suppl): 513S-516S
• 24 Kuster MS. Exercise recommendations after total joint replacement: a review of the current literature and proposal of scientifically based guidelines. Sports Med 2002; 32 (07) 433-445
• 25 Witvoët J, Peyrache MD, Nizard R. [Single-compartment “Lotus” type knee prosthesis in the treatment of lateralized gonarthrosis: results in 135 cases with a mean follow-up of 4.6 years]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 1993; 79 (07) 565-576
• 26 Engh GA, Dwyer KA, Hanes CK. Polyethylene wear of metal-backed tibial components in total and unicompartmental knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74 (01) 9-17
• 27 Bartley RE, Stulberg SD, Robb III WJ, Sweeney HJ. Polyethylene wear in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (299) 18-24
• 28 Epinette JA, Brunschweiler B, Mertl P, Mole D, Cazenave A. ; French Society for Hip and Knee. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty modes of failure: wear is not the main reason for failure: a multicentre study of 418 failed knees. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98 (6, Suppl): S124-S130
• 29 Kuster MS, Spalinger E, Blanksby BA, Gächter A. Endurance sports after total knee replacement: a biomechanical investigation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32 (04) 721-724
• 30 Economic benefits of the health-enhancing effects of physical activity: first estimates for Switzerland. [position statement] Sportmedizin Sporttraumatol 2001; 49 (03) 131-133
• 31 Haid C, Müller E, Raschner C. Forces in the knee joint during the steering phase in alpine skiing. Proceedings of XIVth Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics; July 4–8, 1993; Paris, 530–531
• 32 Berend KR, Lombardi Jr AV, Mallory TH, Adams JB, Groseth KL. Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 440 (440) 60-66
• 33 Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A, Rougraff BT. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (286) 154-159
• 34 Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a 3–10- year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84A: 2235-2239
• 35 Tabor Jr OB, Tabor OB, Bernard M, Wan JY. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term success in middle-age and obese patients. J Surg Orthop Adv 2005; 14 (02) 59-63
• 36 Naal FD, Neuerburg C, Salzmann GM. , et al. Association of body mass index and clinical outcome 2 years after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129 (04) 463-468